<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Words Kill a Subject?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/can-words-kill-a-subject/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/can-words-kill-a-subject/</link>
	<description>Spiritual and Self Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/can-words-kill-a-subject/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/can-words-kill-a-subject/#comment-370</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always felt like we are all plagiarists. In order to communicate ideas, we must learn how to deliver them, we learn by watching and emulating. We relate because we have thought it, or done it too. Even when our experiences don&#039;t jive identically, we can still borrow from our own experience which is likely so similar, that if take an adequate amount of time to really truly contemplate something, we can always find a way to relate. It becomes dependent almost wholly on our relative mutual desire to relate. But yeah, I have had these feelings too. Sometimes, it feels like every single idea in my head is played-out, cliche, overdone, stolen. This extends into my language as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always felt like we are all plagiarists. In order to communicate ideas, we must learn how to deliver them, we learn by watching and emulating. We relate because we have thought it, or done it too. Even when our experiences don&#8217;t jive identically, we can still borrow from our own experience which is likely so similar, that if take an adequate amount of time to really truly contemplate something, we can always find a way to relate. It becomes dependent almost wholly on our relative mutual desire to relate. But yeah, I have had these feelings too. Sometimes, it feels like every single idea in my head is played-out, cliche, overdone, stolen. This extends into my language as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attila Borcsa</title>
		<link>http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/can-words-kill-a-subject/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Attila Borcsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/can-words-kill-a-subject/#comment-366</guid>
		<description>The subject is of great interest for me too. I am glad you wrote about this, excellent post!

A few comments. It is a basic rule in analytical psychology that you do not tell your dream to everybody, except your therapist. Especially if you feel enthusiastic about it, having the impression that this particular dream is of great significance. I would say it goes the same way with other experiences that fell under the category of relevant for one&#039;s self development. Those, like significant dreams, are “charged” for helping you and you alone. Of course, I am not saying that you should never communicate them to other people. Like in the case of the therapist, there are people who can really help in assimilating those experiences, even with the simplest feed-back for just an &#039;objectivation&#039;. But choosing the right people for this is not easy, holding it back until you find them is even harder. 

I like it how you put it. &quot;There is a value in this inability&quot;. Good point!

Regarding the dogma thing, I am not too worried about that. Remaining at the analytical stuff, maybe the dogma is good in helping others to project their unconscious &quot;to be discovered&quot; experiences onto a canvas that more or less suits those. This, of course, only from a strictly self developmental angle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The subject is of great interest for me too. I am glad you wrote about this, excellent post!</p>
<p>A few comments. It is a basic rule in analytical psychology that you do not tell your dream to everybody, except your therapist. Especially if you feel enthusiastic about it, having the impression that this particular dream is of great significance. I would say it goes the same way with other experiences that fell under the category of relevant for one&#8217;s self development. Those, like significant dreams, are “charged” for helping you and you alone. Of course, I am not saying that you should never communicate them to other people. Like in the case of the therapist, there are people who can really help in assimilating those experiences, even with the simplest feed-back for just an &#8216;objectivation&#8217;. But choosing the right people for this is not easy, holding it back until you find them is even harder. </p>
<p>I like it how you put it. &#8220;There is a value in this inability&#8221;. Good point!</p>
<p>Regarding the dogma thing, I am not too worried about that. Remaining at the analytical stuff, maybe the dogma is good in helping others to project their unconscious &#8220;to be discovered&#8221; experiences onto a canvas that more or less suits those. This, of course, only from a strictly self developmental angle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

