<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glow Cat &#8211; Cloned Cat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/glow-cat-cloned-cat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/glow-cat-cloned-cat/</link>
	<description>Spiritual and Self Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Prah</title>
		<link>http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/glow-cat-cloned-cat/comment-page-1/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Prah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/glow-cat-cloned-cat/#comment-1020</guid>
		<description>People are just a bunch of bacteria stuck together. Like a very complex colony of bacteria. Do bacteria have souls? 
If you leave a cup of coffee for a week and it gets moldy, does this mold have a soul? 
Then it would be a murder to clean your own cup, ever thought of that?
There are no souls, there&#039;s only consciousness, defined by programming, be it a piece of code for a computer program, genetics for a biological being, or a set of concepts for a meme (aka spirit, aka archetype). I can copy, edit, or create computer programs as many times as i want for as long as it suits my intentions. Genes are no different. 
There&#039;s probably a gene that defines the concept for spirit. Take it out - there&#039;s no soul. Put it back in - there is one. Put two copies - there are multiple personalities. That simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are just a bunch of bacteria stuck together. Like a very complex colony of bacteria. Do bacteria have souls?<br />
If you leave a cup of coffee for a week and it gets moldy, does this mold have a soul?<br />
Then it would be a murder to clean your own cup, ever thought of that?<br />
There are no souls, there&#8217;s only consciousness, defined by programming, be it a piece of code for a computer program, genetics for a biological being, or a set of concepts for a meme (aka spirit, aka archetype). I can copy, edit, or create computer programs as many times as i want for as long as it suits my intentions. Genes are no different.<br />
There&#8217;s probably a gene that defines the concept for spirit. Take it out &#8211; there&#8217;s no soul. Put it back in &#8211; there is one. Put two copies &#8211; there are multiple personalities. That simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/glow-cat-cloned-cat/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/glow-cat-cloned-cat/#comment-313</guid>
		<description>I have a post going up tomorrow asking similar questions; where does a clones spirit come from?

Or as you point out maybe it doesn&#039;t have one.  And what does that say about the existance of a spirit?

But in either event, as the spirit isn&#039;t physical - aren&#039;t we just kidding ourselves that it could be detected via any physical means?

I feel to some extent one needs a common point of reference to see another beings &#039;spirit&#039;.  That is to say, they need to see their own spirit first.

Tough questions as you say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a post going up tomorrow asking similar questions; where does a clones spirit come from?</p>
<p>Or as you point out maybe it doesn&#8217;t have one.  And what does that say about the existance of a spirit?</p>
<p>But in either event, as the spirit isn&#8217;t physical &#8211; aren&#8217;t we just kidding ourselves that it could be detected via any physical means?</p>
<p>I feel to some extent one needs a common point of reference to see another beings &#8217;spirit&#8217;.  That is to say, they need to see their own spirit first.</p>
<p>Tough questions as you say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave J</title>
		<link>http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/glow-cat-cloned-cat/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thethoughts.co.uk/thoughts/glow-cat-cloned-cat/#comment-312</guid>
		<description>I was hoping that you would ask that very question. DOES anyone actually believe human cloning has not already been perfected? 

Also, wouldn&#039;t a clone be lacking a spirit in the conventional/traditional sense? And if so, does that imply that life can exist without a spirit? And if so does that infer that actually, there is no such thing as &quot;spirit&quot; beyond the mystic and romantic musings of the human mind?

Tough questions to answer, regardless of anyone&#039;s position on the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping that you would ask that very question. DOES anyone actually believe human cloning has not already been perfected? </p>
<p>Also, wouldn&#8217;t a clone be lacking a spirit in the conventional/traditional sense? And if so, does that imply that life can exist without a spirit? And if so does that infer that actually, there is no such thing as &#8220;spirit&#8221; beyond the mystic and romantic musings of the human mind?</p>
<p>Tough questions to answer, regardless of anyone&#8217;s position on the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

