Comments on: The Battle for our Minds – Part 1

By: Dan

Dan — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:05:03 +0000

Speaking of the positives then when I look at the state people are in at the moment that being most people are spiritually, morally dead.

This could be an oppotunity to shake people awake so they start to realise they cannot hand over their decision making abilitys to an elite few and have to being to take responsiblity for themselves. It terms of money well the price of living has exceeded the price of peoples labor as we have allowed so much to be stolen from us and so hopefully the collapse will not work in the favour of the gangbanksters but will favour the people instead.

By: Marcus

Marcus — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:55:32 +0000

It really is a crazy world. Yet part of me finds it incredibly hard to believe that the world would completely break-down under such economic catastrophe.

On some level food production would need to continue. People may not work for money (because there wouldn’t be any), but they certainly would work for food. Maybe in the absence of money, a new form of trading would emerge. Surely it would have to?

Your right, much of this post did focus on the negative aspects of these things – part 2 will be much more positive. I believe that all these changes will lead to a dramatic shift in how humans deal with each other.

Decentralization, and a return to community based living are just two of the most obvious outcomes.

By: Dan

Dan — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:59:13 +0000

Its definately a set of potential probabilitys for the future and I think its fair to say you have expressed the negative potential which is the likely outcome if we maintain what we are currently doing.

Food and Oil prices are directly linked with the printing of money by nation banks, you say they have assets? what assests? they hold some gold but essentialy they have no assests they cant bail out anyone in reality because they dont print real value they print valueless debt. When they print they dilute whats already in circualtion meaning the person on $1-2 a day for their labor can no long purchase food because that 1 dollar’s value has been debased and hence a riot. in the UK it simply means we get less food/oil for a money = labor but that is also not sustainable because the only direction is that peoples labor becomes worth less and less untill a critical point is reached where basics can no longer be purchased for our labor because essentialy its been stolen by the gangbanksters.

If currency actually fails with a total collapse then that will mean catasrophic disaster in a country like the UK as far as I can tell. No one will work because there will be no money to work for production will stop and its estimated that within a week people will steal and within 2 weeks they will kill for food and water within 2 months 90% of the population will be dead.